Have a "Rock Star" QA Team with some of these suggestions to get your started.
A look inside the design and implementation of one of the first virtual QA labs, policies, practices, experiences and procedures.
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Ten Ways to Improve Quality Productivity
Have a "Rock Star" QA Team with some of these suggestions to get your started.
Saturday, July 12, 2008
Getting Started with your Virtual QA Lab
You love the idea of a virtual QA Lab but wonder how to begin. At the beginning, as with any project, with the high level requirements and the business systems design review. Get your ideas in line with the needs of the business.
Define and Prepare
The solution must be designed to provide stable services to the Quality Assurance and Development Departments by implementing network servers and updated software purchased from approved vendors. This will have direct impact on reducing business risk, increasing availability of the applications in line with current projections for the QA and Development Departments and compliance with SoX audit trail requirements. Not worried about SoX? Someone in your organization will be concerned with audits, be is SoX or something else. Having an audit trail protects the business from anything that may occur in the future so plan for it now.
Anyone for Scope?
Gain a complete understanding of what exists today in your world. Do you have any single point of failures? Lack of failover systems? Operating systems that are not part of a security patching schedule and are therefore out of date posing a security risk. Have the needs and volume changed since the original equipment was put in place? What are those? How do you plan to address that?
The Virtual QA lab will aims to resolve all the outdated and growth issues now and in the future by upgrading hardware, implementing adequate security polices and adding support and training. Be sure your plan:
- Is clear and focused to avoid misinterpretation.
- Measureble to be quantified and compared to other data.
- Attainable: achievable, reasonable, and credible under conditions expected.
- Realistic: fits into the organization's constraints and is cost effective.
- Timely.
For example, in the initial phase, new hardware may be purchased and installed in an approved data center. New Application software may be installed and configured. Be sure to include assets and how they will be accommodated.
Be absolutely certain to include savings, this is a critical part of this plan. Include those costs associated with exposure due to outdated and aged out hardware, as well as growth both immediate and in the future.
Get Specific
If you have done your homework up to know, you are fully aware of the pains within the QA organization and the organization overall. Address those pains in specific, real terms. What if you are new or trying to do this as an outside vendor with no specifics? Ask questions! Most clients are more than happy to talk about their pain. They need your help, after all, that is why they are talking to you in the first place. Don't miss any opportunities to learn about the pain and pleasure of the current systems and environments and address them.
Need Help?
Give me a call, an email or contact me in whatever way you feel most comfortable. I am very happy to help and am certain I can be of help to you in your plan. I have implemented this solution ins both large and small organizations and can customize this cost saving solution to fit any environment and company size.
Friday, May 23, 2008
Debunking The Cost Of Quality And Productivity
I hear an awful about the cost of quality and how it impacts production in such negative terms. I thought maybe it's time to debunk the myth that investing in quality negatively impacts production.
Quantify This
the cost of quality is not defined as the expenses in creating, deploying and supporting a quality system as most think. It is rather the cost of not adopting a program. How much does it cost you to loose a contract for low quality? What does that do to your credibility? How does your bottom line suffer from your inability to gain more customers and secure more contracts? Actions speak a lot louder than words, as do bottom line realizations.
So, how much does it really cost?
It is a well know fact that poor quality costs the average business 15 to 30% because its product or service was not done right in the first place. So what is in the 15-30%? Rework, returns and big dollars. Is it worth the risk of loosing 15 or 30% for low quality? I am sure each of you can find something better to spend that money on.
1-10-100
So how much does a quality program really cost? An accurate rule of thumb suggests that a quality problem costing $100 to resolve in the field would cost only $10 to correct if discovered during design review and merely $1 to prevent in the first place. Surely, your reputation and bottom line are worth a dollar. There are four basic areas that will need your attention in developing your cost of implementing quality are Prevention, Inspection or Appraisal, Internal failure and the dreaded External failure cost. That makes them about a quarter each, a bargain at twice the price!
Investment
You have invested in the best machines, hired the brightest and smartest programmers in the industry to work on what you believe, it the best product or service around. I know you believe that or you would not get up every morning to go in to work. With all your dedication, hard work and effort, your investments are depreciating by the hour and being over utilized to clean up the mistakes made. This is a vicious cycle that feeds itself, the harder you work, the more you push, the deeper you get. Would you like a return on this investment? Quality programs actually appreciate with time. Your initial dollar ends up being two dollars in a year!
Lessons Learned
In conclusion, it is fair to say that we have witnessed quite a few failures recently due to poor quality programs. Had Mattel implemented quality standards into their contract with the firm who manufactured the toys that are responsible for the death of children with high lead levels, their stock would be riding high. Imagine if Topps had done better inspections of the beef and internal process checks, they might still be in business today instead of bankruptcy court. The cost of poor quality is high on many levels. It's worth a dollar.